Difference between revisions of "Profit/Fee - Structured Approaches"
From Knowledge base
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<ref>DCMA-INST 120 April 1, 2014, Section 3.3.7.1</ref>The three structured approaches used for developing a pre-negotiation profit or | <ref>DCMA-INST 120 April 1, 2014, Section 3.3.7.1</ref>The three structured approaches used for developing a pre-negotiation profit or | ||
fee objective are: | fee objective are: | ||
| + | |||
* the weighted guidelines method (DFARS and DFARS/PGI 215.404-71, References (k) and (h)), | * the weighted guidelines method (DFARS and DFARS/PGI 215.404-71, References (k) and (h)), | ||
| + | |||
* the modified weighted guidelines method (DFARS 215.404-72, Reference (k)), and | * the modified weighted guidelines method (DFARS 215.404-72, Reference (k)), and | ||
| + | |||
* an alternate structured approach (DFARS 215.404-73, Reference (k)). The weighted guidelines method is the most commonly used structured approach for profit analysis. | * an alternate structured approach (DFARS 215.404-73, Reference (k)). The weighted guidelines method is the most commonly used structured approach for profit analysis. | ||
Latest revision as of 15:35, 15 January 2016
[1]The three structured approaches used for developing a pre-negotiation profit or fee objective are:
- the weighted guidelines method (DFARS and DFARS/PGI 215.404-71, References (k) and (h)),
- the modified weighted guidelines method (DFARS 215.404-72, Reference (k)), and
- an alternate structured approach (DFARS 215.404-73, Reference (k)). The weighted guidelines method is the most commonly used structured approach for profit analysis.
References
- ↑ DCMA-INST 120 April 1, 2014, Section 3.3.7.1
