Difference between revisions of "Board of Director Minutes"

From Knowledge base
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Agency Authority==<ref>10.U.S. Code §2313. Examination of records of contractor </ref>
  
[g] Defective Pricing Audits<ref>Accounting for Government Contracts: Federal Acquisition Regulation</ref><ref>10.U.S. Code §2313. Examination of records of contractor </ref>
+
[g] Defective Pricing Audits<ref>Accounting for Government Contracts: Federal Acquisition Regulation</ref>
  
 
Contractors are required to submit cost or pricing data if a contract (or a contract modification) exceeds $2M.  Audits to detect defective pricing are performed to assess the validity of the contractor's cost or pricing data.  When such  audits are conducted, a number of approaches are used to uncover incomplete or outdated cost or pricing data.  These include:
 
Contractors are required to submit cost or pricing data if a contract (or a contract modification) exceeds $2M.  Audits to detect defective pricing are performed to assess the validity of the contractor's cost or pricing data.  When such  audits are conducted, a number of approaches are used to uncover incomplete or outdated cost or pricing data.  These include:

Revision as of 15:25, 13 September 2019

==Agency Authority==[1]

[g] Defective Pricing Audits[2]

Contractors are required to submit cost or pricing data if a contract (or a contract modification) exceeds $2M. Audits to detect defective pricing are performed to assess the validity of the contractor's cost or pricing data. When such audits are conducted, a number of approaches are used to uncover incomplete or outdated cost or pricing data. These include:

(1) reviewing minutes of board of directors meetings or correspondence concerning capital expenditures; (2) reviewing contractor newsletters announcing new or improved manufacturing processes or the purchase of new machinery that will reduce production costs.

Related Topics/Links

Corporate Family[3] Corporations and disclosures go beyond the legal entity holding the contract. Algese 2 SCARL v. United States, No. 15-1279C (Fed. Cl. March 14, 2016),

https://www.crowell.com/files/20160316-Contractors-Must-Deal-With-Integrity-Issues-In-Proposals-Robbins-Eyre-Lynch.pdf


Reference

  1. 10.U.S. Code §2313. Examination of records of contractor
  2. Accounting for Government Contracts: Federal Acquisition Regulation
  3. Peter Eyre, Law 360